Research and Writing Methods
(480.600.52)
Syllabus
Spring 2008

Course Description/Assignments/Grading
Course Outline/Schedule
Reading List and Other Resources
Student Survey
Final Paper Peer Review

 

 

Final Paper Peer Review
 

Evaluator:__________________________________

 

Author:____________________________________

 

Topic:____________________________________

 

 

  1. Please list 2 strengths of the paper.
 
 
 
  1. Does the intro convince you the study is worthwhile? If not give a suggestion for what argument might be convincing or what the author should do to beef up the argument. If so, say what was the most compelling part.
 
 
 
 
 
  1. Does the author back up the claims in the intro with evidence? If not, say what claims need evidence.
 
 
 
 
 
 
  1. Do you have a clear idea about the state of knowledge based on the literature review? If yes, summarize the main idea of the literature review in one sentence here. If not explain why you are confused and give suggestions for improvement.
 
 
 
 
 
 
  1. Does the paper synthesize the studies and explain what is missing? If not explain how this might be better done.
 
 
 
 
 
 
  1. Is the literature review well organized? If yes, list the three ideas in the literature review. If no, give some suggestions for how to organize.
 
 
 
 
  1. Is the research question clearly stated? Does it flow from the literature review? If not explain why.
 
 
 
 
  1. Is the literature review related to the research question? Is there some literature that should be included but is not? (What?) Is there material included that does not appear to be relevant? (What?)
 
 
 
 
 
  1. Does the paper present a clear research question or hypothesis? If not explain why you are confused and give suggestions.
 
 
 
 
 
 
  1. Does the method section layout a clear idea of how the study will be conducted? Explain why or why not.
 
 
 
 
 
  1. Will the study as laid out in the method section answer the research question? If not why not?
 
 
 
 
 
 
  1. Does the method section cite literature that explains how to do the method appropriately? Make any suggestions for improvement.
 
 
 
 
 
  1. Is the paper free of grammatical, spelling, formatting, and APA errors? What errors are consistently made, if any?
 
 
 
 
 
 
  1. Please list the two things that most need improvement in this paper.